See what
gets verified.

These principles describe the planned service.

• Payment is never approval.
• Fees cover review work, documentation and agreed follow-up.
• The same evidence, scope and method give the same outcome.
• The absence of a badge is not a negative assessment.
• The customer cannot control the result.
• Customers may submit evidence, request factual corrections and appeal.
• Customers cannot remove findings or rewrite published history.
• An authorised human decision-maker is responsible for decisions.
• A second reviewer checks the first issuance and material changes.
• Trust Score and catalogue priority cannot be bought.

• An authorised representative must confirm participation.
• An application, email or domain link alone is insufficient.
• Organisational relationships are assessed within their stated scope.
• V1 excludes network performance, finances, tokens and decentralisation.
• Future performance and overall project approval are outside V1.

• This later scope is not available yet.
• Claims require a defined service, period, method and observation history.
• Any decision applies only to the claims and period reviewed.
• A badge cannot be bought as an upgrade or earned through long-term participation.

1. Application · Confirm organisation, representative, project and scope.
2. Pre-check · Check eligibility, mandate and feasibility.
3. Order · Agree scope, terms, validity and possible outcomes.
4. Review · Assess evidence, gaps, contradictions and limitations.
5. Decision · Human decision-maker, with a second reviewer.
6. Publication · Apply existing publication rules; protect sensitive documents.
7. Follow-up · Handle changes, renewal, corrections and revocation.

Customers may submit evidence, request factual corrections and appeal.

• Every badge will link to its public decision record.
• Read permitted evidence without an account; sensitive documents stay protected.
• Source versions, collection dates, findings and limitations will be recorded.
• Documents from one publisher are not independent confirmation.
• Original scope, method, corrections and status history remain traceable.
• Collection, human review and status checks have separate dates.
• Reuse existing project records, evidence and history.
• No published organisation verification.
• This is not a negative assessment of the project.
• Sources and factual reviews are presented separately.
• Projects receive neutral treatment, whether they participate or pay.
• A missing public decision does not reveal whether someone applied.
• Free and discounted pilots use the same method.
• Factual corrections do not require a purchase.
• An incomplete review is not automatically a public negative assessment.
• Ending service does not erase history or imply fraud.